Evidence mounting against the West’s narrative of the downing of MH17 in East Ukraine……

As the months roll on evidence is continuing to mount against the mainstreams narrative of what happened that tragic day of the downing of MH17 over Ukrainian territory which was blamed on the Self defense forces right from the start without any real evidence to prove this was the case.

More and more aviation experts are now coming forward refuting the mainstreams narrative that the Self Defense Forces shot down MH17 with a BUK missile in the East of the country on that faithful day.

One of these experts is Peter Haisenko in an article he wrote he describes the downing of MH17 by smaller projectiles and that the conclusion was that MH17 was not hit by a missile but rather by cannon fire from a military jet. (http://investmentwatchblog.com/new-mh17-sensation-german-experts-point-finger-at-ukrainian-air-force-jets/)

On the 30th of July 2014 a video of a short segment of an interview done by CBC with OSCE monitor Michel Bociurikiw was uploaded to youtube. In the short segment OSCE monitor Michel Bociurikiw states that bullet holes on the fuselage resembles that of “machine gun fire very, very strong machine gun fire” which hadMH17 bullet holes left unique marks on the plane.

Michel then goes on to say that they had been asked questions had there been any evidence collected so far to suggest a missile had struck MH17? Which he states “no we haven’t that’s the answer” but goes on to say they had not had the expert eyes to see it but now they do.

So the question then must be asked where is the evidence of a missile having hit the plane? Surely they would have found something credible by now if the narrative of the mainstream was correct and a BUK missile did hit the plane.

From the outset the investigation into the downing of MH17 was flawed in fact it was none existent for weeks before an OSCE mission eventually turned up and began the recovery process.

Pictures which were uploaded onto a social network supposedly showing the transportation of a BUK missile system somewhere in Ukraine were used by the US state department as evidence that the Self Defense Forces were involved with the downing of the plane.

But as expected and as seen time and time before the pictures turned out to be fakes taking on different days to the downing of MH17 see link below:

Most evidence being provided by the US to indicate Russian involvement in Ukraine time and time again has been shown to be less than credible but it certainly does not stop the demonizing of Russia on the TV screens.

Many residents from the surrounding areas reported hearing loud explosions and seeing at least 2 planes in the sky one being a small military plane.

These statements were documented by a BBC reporter shortly after the downing of MH17 but of course because these statements did not fit into West’s narrative that a BUK missile was behind the downing of the plane the report was not aired.( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVdwUdlswOY )

Witnesses remarked to aMH17n RT journalist that if there had of been a BUK missile used there would have been a white trail left behind it in the sky but this was not the case on that day.

This same witness also mentions seeing a military jet flying the other way after the plane had fell from the sky in East Ukraine   ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzWalKrSIYE)

Peoples perceptions of the conflict in Ukraine are widely formed by mass media but more and more often people are seeking information for themselves through other avenues instead of relying on the mainstream for information because they know they are being lied to and deceived on a grand scale and not just with the Ukraine situation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s